Evolution and belief in god
is incompatible according to Dawkin’s claims. Aquinas says that the existence
of god can easily be supported by reasoning. These two articles contradict each
other competently. Dawkin feels that it is not god who was the reason for being
the “mover” or “cause” to how society has formed over time. I feel that Aquinas
response to Dawkin’s is that he would strongly disagree and try to persuade
Dawkin and reason being stronger in faith will help a person uphold his or her
reasoning and beliefs of what is going on in the world and how it has changed
over time. Dawkin feels that instead of the word “god” people who are religious
should have chosen the name “terminator”. He also feels that the beginning of
time should be called “The Big Bang” in theory a huge star blew up and created
all the different planets and galaxies. All Dawkin is doing is denying that
Aquinas has a point and how people made up a unhuman person which was the
creator of life.
No comments:
Post a Comment